With the new, longer MCAT2015 here, we’re all looking for new ways to practice the skills and memorize the considerable information necessary to excel.

As you know, we’ve been doing exhaustive reviews of the materials that are out there. Today, I’m reviewing some of the major offerings as far as ready-made and easily portable study options go.

Each of these show promise, and I hope that their creators update and improve on them.

Below is a quick recap of my “best of’s”.  I’ve also gone into more detail on each set — including the cost — and included examples where possible. (Click on the blue hyperlinks to jump ahead to the reviews further down):

Best to use right now: Kaplan

I’d probably get Kaplan at this point if I had to choose from these players as they are currently. I’d miss out on spaced repetition, but it’s pretty inexpensive, and the questions and explanations are solid.

Best “Flash” card content: Kaplan

This is a big reason I chose Kaplan as best to use right now. This post and the one I wrote recently about flashcards focus on “flash” cards, and not the rolodex type of card, as these are better for memorization, especially of the type required for this new test. Kaplan’s questions and answers are clear, concise, and connect well to one another.

Best “Rolodex” content: Firecracker

These aren’t so great as “flash” cards because the answers are long and often not so tailored to the question, so they don’t work well for making of quick associations. However, the explanations are a great learning tool, and the format/functionality are pretty solid.

Most promising functionality: Memorang

This company has solid functionality and a very active team of developers who are creating new functions as we speak. Already, they have an innovative way of organizing their content into categories to aid review of related information when reading the prompt of the card. The cards are also very affordable. I’m eager to see what the company does going forward, but have far too many misgivings with the content to recommend them now.

Most promising content: Brainscape

If the remainder of their cards are as good and as comprehensive as the ones that are out, they will be the clear content leader. Their functionality could use some work, e.g. an Android app, the ability to mix cards online with these sets.

Best for use with your own flashcards: Memorang

I still use cram.com with the Flashcards app on my phone for my own studying (as this is a quick and dirty solution that has plenty of functionality), but I’m considering switching to Memorang, and you should too. It’s free, so you benefit from whatever developments are in the pipeline. And they have this helpful blog post explaining how to make good flashcards and specifically how to use their nifty “tag” feature. If they had followed their own advice more with their MCAT card sets, I’d recommend them unreservedly above all others.

Here is more in-depth feedback on Firecracker, Memorang, Kaplan, Scrub Ninjas, McGraw-Hill BenchPrep, and Brainscape:

Firecracker:

(+) Positives

+ Variety of styles of questions

+ Good use of the format

+ Solid explanations

+ Some flexibility

+ Spaced Repetition

+ Email summaries of progress and reminders of what’s to be done

 Negatives

Answers often don’t correspond to questions

 Questions are often vague and don’t serve well for making associations

Examples:
Q: “How do large, bulky groups affect the reactivity of acid derivatives?”
A: Like aldehydes and ketones, sterics alter the reactivity of the molecules

Q: “What are the major functions of the government as a social institution?”
A: The government is a social institution that creates and enforces the rules of a society, and manages relations with other societies.

Q: What changes under thermal expansion?
A: Length

 Difficult to decipher equations and/or unnecessarily difficult equations

Example:
Q: What equation gives the voltage on a charging capacitor?
A: A charging capacitor obeys similar equations for voltage and current as a function of time. For a charging capacitor, we have V(t) = Vo*(1 – exp(-t/R*C)) and I(t) = Io*(1 – exp(-t/R*C))

· Second, the equation itself should probably have been written out and copied in as an image such as this one (which uses slightly different subscripts to label different voltages): 

Bottom Line:
Between flash and rolodex-type cards. True MCQs. Great reviews. You can mix and match sets of cards. Cards become “due” so you don’t have to go to weaker sections and review them individually.

Cost:
$39 for one month, $99 for four, $299 for twelve.

Memorang

(+) Positives

+ Little words of encouragement about streaks and updated goals

+ Start at 50% completed/correct for every subject and work up or down, which is a clever way to show trends and to chase perfection

+ Categories – Flashcards have subjects and then types/categories

+ Good coverage of Biochem, excellent coverage of concise definitions/examples in behavioral sciences

+ Can quickly see what areas need more work through % correct and color coding (red-yellow-green)

+ Many, many cards, much coverage, seems to be appropriate for coverage on MCAT2015

+ Great coverage of electrolytes – charge and formula

+ Flexible, with innovative plans for the future

Negatives

 Vague questions
Examples:
Prompt: Velocity and average velocity – Ask for Equation

Prompt: Pythagorean theorem, with a triangle shown; no question
A: “True for right triangles” (…What?)

Prompt: Ohmmeter (That’s it)
A: Requires circuit to not be active

Prompt: Hypoventilation
A #1: Leads to the acidification of blood (respiratory acidosis)
A #2: When ventilation is inadequate to perform needed gas exchange

 Limitations of the structure of these cards contribute to the vague questions

Example:
Prompt: Pyruvate Dehydrogenase – attributes
A: Stimulated by insulin, inhibited by acetyl-CoA

Unhelpful questions
Q: Anaphase II
A: A stage of meiosis

– Overly complex answers

 Lost potential for explanation of more difficult concepts

 Multiple choice option is not made up of true MCQs (they are made of a prompt with multiple responses thrown together as possible answers), so some answers make no sense

Bottom Line:
The interface/structure provide some benefits and some limitations. Though there are many poorly worded questions, the level of detail and structure show much potential as the makers surely improve on the presentation. Update: Since I wrote this review initially, the makers of Memorang have implemented a number of updates to their software, including improved spaced repetition and study algorithms, as well as a way to “compete” against time and against other users, of which I’m an especially big fan. My major complaint, however, remains the quality of prompts and responses in the cards.

Cost:
The pricing is just $29 for lifetime access!!!

Kaplan

(+)Positives
+ Simple, clean interface
+ Ability to reset data
+ Can make decks with many options, including unanswered cards, cards that you knew, didn’t know, or on which you were unsure
+ Concise, useful, accurate answers
+ Clear stats for performance on the major categories of cards
+ Equations are presented in two dimensions, without confusing notation of sub-/superscripts
+ Good help page explaining how to use the app
+ Ability to use paper cards or the app

Negatives
Some vague questions, e.g. “Current” with no other description/prompt
Responses, though good, are between simple associations and rolodex format
Does not seem to be spaced repetition or much ability to change how things are tested
No ability to just read the cards as a list of information
No ability to break down the major subjects into smaller ones, e.g. to go over cards of just respiration in biochemistry

Bottom Line:
This is a simple set/app that does not have/give the ability to do things that many other flashcard apps do, but what it does, it does well. The explanations are mostly solid, with much fewer vagaries in questions and answers than in other apps. The style and level of complexity is somewhere between flash and rolodex, but the balance struck is pretty good. I just wish it had spaced repetition.

Cost:
$22 on Amazon, one time fee

Scrub Ninjas

(+) Positives
+ Fun, if redundant, interface that increases challenge by having time limits for answering
+ Very clear questions with clear multiple choice answers
+ Plenty of details
+ Spaced repetition

 Negatives
In-app purchases for throwing weapons, which essentially give away the answer (I’d rather just get them wrong and learn from it)
Can’t scroll through questions and answers
Spaced repetition is for each section. No option to have certain questions “due” each day, or to mix sets (This might be available in the full paid version if that has different menus, though, again, it didn’t seem worth it to me to buy that, and there is no indication of such functionality in the app store or on the website.)

Bottom Line:
This app shows promise, as what it does, it does well. This might end up being a good option for students who would be too bored to use flashcards regularly without a fun graphical interface.

Cost:

Scrub Ninjas currently has the 3 following MCAT review games:

MCAT Behavioral Sciences (Psychology & Sociology) $19.99

MCAT Biological Sciences (Biochemistry & Physiology) $9.99

McGraw-Hill BenchPrep

(+) Positives
+ Part of a much larger online system available on multiple devices, and with a number of other capabilities (games, practice passage-based questions, the ability to make a study plan, entire books, motivational “achievements”, forums, and progress reports).
+ There’s a sort of spaced repetition. You have the option to choose your confidence level in an answer.
+ Images of amino acid side groups – definitely a new, important, challenge on this new exam that is worth reviewing in this way
+ Free!* (*with purchase and registration of a book in their set. That is, with purchase of each book, you get access to that part of their online platform. Not yet available separately)

Negatives
 Vague prompts with rambling responses.
For example, in behavioral sciences:

Though you can denote how confident you felt on a card, it doesn’t get repeated automatically at a certain point based on that rating. You have to go back in and review the cards in that confidence level.

Bottom Line:
McGraw-Hill’s heart and vision are in the right place. They want to make a one-stop shop – materials, course, community, games, coach, everything in one. Hopefully, this is a work-in-progress, though there’s no indication that users should expect updates. As it stands, it’s a good idea that is very incomplete. If you purchase and prefer the books anyway, you get everything else for no additional cost, which probably provides some marginal benefit. However, comparing the flashcards on their own to the others on this page, these pale. Even if I had these flashcards for free, I’d not use them over the other purchasing and using the other options. They’re just not very good, and what small benefit they offer can very easily be replaced or produced elsewhere.

Cost:
$149 for their Standard Plan (510 Questions, 2 Tests, 17 Study Units); or $399 for their Ultimate Plan (770 Questions, 2 Tests, 632 Study Units, 230 Flashcards). Both are 12-month subscriptions.

Brainscape

(+) Positives
+ Very clearly worded flashcards and concise, helpful responses
+ Spaced repetition
+ So many flashcards! 500 for Physics, 500 for GChem!
+ You can make and add your own cards
+ You can suggest edits

 Negatives
No Android app makes me 🙁
Can’t seem to study flashcards from multiple sets together, at least not online
Only GChem and Physics cards available! That’s a small part of this test!

Bottom Line:
Well-worded and thorough questions for the topics it covers and spaced repetition, but as yet very incomplete. Also, no Android app?! If this one day includes all the sciences, maintains its quality, allows for testing of multiple sets at once, is available on non-iOS devices, and costs no more than ~$60, I’d think it worth it. Until then, though, what’s the point? They have a ton of questions on the two most concept-heavy, memorization-light sciences on the test. That’s not where review with flashcards is needed.

Cost: 
$9.99 for either MCAT General Chemistry or MCAT Physics; $17.99 for both.

Final Note:

Again, at least some of these companies claim to be continuously improving their products and reacting to feedback (someone email them this post!), so who knows? Maybe we’ll look back on this in a few months and come to a very different conclusion.